Archive for June 28, 2012

Mr. Peppers Takes Mitt on a Road Trip

Just watch this.

(Via.)

Good night.

June 28, 2012 at 9:55 PM Leave a comment

Flagstaff Fire — Eerily Beautiful Photo

The Flagstaff Fire is 40% contained but it’s windy tonight and I smell smoke.  But hey, I’m still vertical and on the right side of the grass so there’s this: an eerily beautiful photo from a CBSDenvert slide show of the Flagstaff fire.

This is my favorite:

(Image via: Denver.CBSLocal.com)

 

 

 

June 28, 2012 at 9:38 PM Leave a comment

The Supreme Court Legalizes Lying

This is another of the decision handed down by the Supreme Court today.

In United States v. Alvarez, a highly anticipated First Amendment case with a quirky fact pattern, the Court held in a vote of six to three that the Stolen Valor Act is unconstitutional. Justice Kennedy announced the opinion for a plurality of the Court (he was joined by the Chief Justice as well as Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor). Justices Breyer and Kagan concurred, suggesting that if Congress re-enacted the law with additional limitations, it might be constitutional.

[...]

The Stolen Valor Act, 18 U.S.C. § 704, makes it a federal crime to lie about having received a military decoration or medal, punishable by up to a year in prison if the offense involved the military’s highest honors. In this case Xavier Alvarez, recently elected to the Board of Directors of the Three Valley Water District in southern California, announced to his colleagues – for no apparent reason – that he had been awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor and that he had been wounded during active duty as a United States Marine. In reality, Alvarez had never even served in the military. He was prosecuted and pled guilty to one count of violating the Stolen Valor Act, but reserved his right to challenge the constitutionality of the statute.

The key issue is whether the First Amendment protects false statements of fact – made without any apparent intent to defraud or gain anything – and if so, what level of protection they deserve. …  Six Justices agreed that some protection was warranted, but disagreed as to the amount, and three Justices believe that the First Amendment does not protect such lies at all.

More…

But again, six justices agree that the First Amendment protects “false statements of fact.”  Excuse me but I think that’s more commonly known as lying.

No words.

June 28, 2012 at 7:39 PM Leave a comment

Michele Bachmann Proves Me Right

What did I tell you?  That the neocons would start railing against “activist judges” because they don’t like SCOTUS’s decision on health care?

Well, thank you very much Michele Bachmann:

Bachmann Rails Against Activist Court After Health Care Ruling

These guys are so boringly predictable.

Oh, and look at the time on that screenshot (see larger version at the link above).  It says 8:37 PT.  That means she was doing the “activist judges” thing at 10:37 ET, roughly 90 minutes after the decision was announced.  She obviously turned to the GOP talking points manual and looked under disagree-with-court-decision and found:  Scream:  Activist judges!

June 28, 2012 at 4:18 PM Leave a comment

Ever Heard of “Crack Broccoli?”

I had never heard of “Crack Broccoli” until three minutes ago when a friend sent me a link to the foodie website, Ben&birdy.  According to Ben&birdy, Crack Broccoli is phenomenally delicious:

Only my friend Maddie could make a vegetable that would get nicknamed “Crack Broccoli”—and that would be the first thing to disappear at a party where it was placed among such delights as chips and dip, oozing triple-cream cheese, and ginger-prosecco cocktails. Children literally shoved aside bowls of candy to grab at the vanishing broccoli, and you know I don’t use the word “literally” figuratively. So I asked for the recipe.

So heck, I thought I’d share.  I’m going to try it.  I’ve made cauliflower this way and it’s great.

(Image via: Benandbirdy.blogspot.com)

Oven-Roasted Broccoli
Serves 4
Active time: 10 minutes; total time: 20 minutes
1 large head broccoli
3 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil
1 teaspoon kosher salt (or half as much table salt)
1/2 teaspoon sugar
Lemon wedges, for serving (I keep forgetting this, but I’m sure it would be good)
Peel the broccoli with a sharp paring knife as best as you’re able. The thick peel will keep the broccoli from going fully tender, so you really do want to remove it.
Adjust an oven rack to the lowest position, place a large rimmed baking sheet on the rack, and heat the oven to 500 degrees. Cut the stem off of the broccoli, and cut it into long, ½-inch thick pieces. Cut the rest of the broccoli into long, fairly narrow florets, then put it in a bowl, drizzle it with the oil and toss well until evenly coated. Sprinkle with the salt and sugar, and toss to combine. (The sugar helps it brown, so please don’t omit it.)
Working quickly, remove the baking sheet from the oven. Carefully transfer the broccoli to the baking sheet and spread it in an even layer, placing it flat sides down wherever possible.
Return the baking sheet to the oven and roast until the stalks are well browned and tender and the florets are lightly browned, 9 to 11 minutes. Transfer to a serving dish and serve immediately with lemon wedges (if you remember).
More info here.

 

 

June 28, 2012 at 3:58 PM 2 comments

In Lieu of SCOTUS Decision, GOP Now Talking About “Armed Rebellion”

This is what happens when a Republican surrounds himself with Fox and Rush:  He thinks a majority of voters belong to the Tea Party and that a majority of voters will think what he has to say is perfectly reasonable:

(Image via MichiganCapitolConfidential.com)

The former spokesman for the Michigan Republican Party sent out an email that questioned whether armed rebellion was justified over the Supreme Court ruling upholding Obamacare.

Matthew Davis, an attorney in Lansing, sent the email moments after the Supreme Court ruling to numerous new media outlets and limited government activists with the headline: “Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?”

Davis added his own personal note saying, “… here’s my response. And yes, I mean it.”

“There are times government has to do things to get what it wants and holds a gun to your head,” Davis said. “I’m saying at some point, we have to ask the question when do we turn that gun around and say no and resist.

“Was the American Revolution justified?”

More…

This is wacko.  And Davis is a lawyer?  Where did he get his JD?  Liberty University?  And don’t you just love how Republicans are so fond of evoking images of people waving guns around?

 

 

June 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM Leave a comment

CNN is the Butt of Today’s Perfect Photoshop

Hah!

(Via.)

If you don’t get it, go here and then here.

 

June 28, 2012 at 12:34 PM 1 comment

Older Posts


Follow Me On Twitter

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,235 other followers