Archive for May 2, 2012

Republican Logic: Ban Water Guns, Allow Hand Guns

Vote Republican in November and we can have this kind of crazy everywhere:

(Image via

In the politically-charged and likely protest-filled streets of Tampa, Fla., during the Republican National Convention in August, water guns will be strictly prohibited. Concealed handguns, on the other hand, will be perfectly legal.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott said this week that banning handguns from downtown Tampa during the convention, as the city’s Mayor Bob Buckhorn requested, “would surely violate the Second Amendment.”

“It is unclear how disarming law-abiding citizens would better protect them from the dangers and threats posed by those who would flout the law,” Scott said in a letter to Buckhorn Tuesday, emphasizing the words “law-abiding.” “It is at just such times that the constitutional right of self defense is most precious and must be protected from government overreach.”

Buckhorn said today that he was “disappointed” by Scott’s decision, but that the city will “plan and train accordingly.”

Tampa officials are expecting thousands of protesters to descend on the Florida metropolis for the GOP convention. While no handguns will be allowed inside the convention, which is being protected by the Secret Service, concealed carry license-holders will be able to carry their weapons in the streets surrounding the convention.

They will not, however, be able to have “super soaker” water guns, sticks, poles, portable shields or glass bottles.


The police will be freaked out (as they should be) at the potential of literally everyone carrying a gun; the delegates will be freaked out; the press will be freaked out. It will be a terrifying place to be.  I can’t imagine Scott’s order will stand, but hey, who knows.  The NRA rules.

I’ll keep you posted.


May 2, 2012 at 6:00 PM 1 comment

Waiting for Slash-the-Budget Righties to Have a Fit About This

Hey, I have an idea. Let’s cut food stamps, unemployment benefits, Social Security, education, environmental protections, funds for road and bridge repair, food safety programs and shit like that so we can spend a trilling dollars on new toys for the military.  (BTW, I thought drones were the new new thing.  Do we need fighter jets anymore?)

The F-35 Aircraft
(Image via

The Jet That Ate the Pentagon

The F-35 is a boondoggle. It’s time to throw it in the trash bin.

The United States is making a gigantic investment in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, billed by its advocates as the next — by their count the fifth — generation of air-to-air and air-to-ground combat aircraft. Claimed to be near invisible to radar and able to dominate any future battlefield, the F-35 will replace most of the air-combat aircraft in the inventories of the U.S. Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and at least nine foreign allies, and it will be in those inventories for the next 55 years. It’s no secret, however, that the program — the most expensive in American history — is a calamity.

This month, we learned that the Pentagon has increased the price tag for the F-35 by another $289 million — just the latest in a long string of cost increases — and that the program is expected to account for a whopping 38 percent of Pentagon procurement for defense programs, assuming its cost will grow no more.


First, with regard to cost — a particularly important factor in what politicians keep saying is an austere defense budget environment — the F-35 is simply unaffordable. Although the plane was originally billed as a low-cost solution, major cost increases have plagued the program throughout the last decade. Last year, Pentagon leadership told Congress the acquisition price had increased another 16 percent, from $328.3 billion to $379.4 billion for the 2,457 aircraft to be bought. Not to worry, however — they pledged to finally reverse the growth.

The result? This February, the price increased another 4 percent to $395.7 billion and then even further in April. Don’t expect the cost overruns to end there: The test program is only 20 percent complete, the Government Accountability Office has reported, and the toughest tests are yet to come. Overall, the program’s cost has grown 75 percent from its original 2001 estimate of $226.5 billion — and that was for a larger buy of 2,866 aircraft.


A final note on expense: The F-35 will actually cost multiples of the $395.7 billion cited above. That is the current estimate only to acquire it, not the full life-cycle cost to operate it. The current appraisal for operations and support is $1.1 trillion — making for a grand total of $1.5 trillion, or more than the annual GDP of Spain.


I crack myself up when I say I’m waiting for slash-the-budget righties to have a fit about this because that’ll never happen.  The boys who are building this thing are their buddies.  What’s going on here is basically another TARP program under the guise of “keeping us safe;” a trillion dollars for something we don’t know works. Who does that?




May 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM Leave a comment

Up is Down on Fox

Check out this Fox graphic.  According to the ADP report (released this morning), 119,000 jobs were added to the U.S. economy in April.  So, ah, what’s with that downward-pointing red arrow in the background?  Oh, yeah, right.  This is Fox!


May 2, 2012 at 2:32 PM Leave a comment

Terrifying Glass Floored Bathroom

Would you have a problem using this bathroom?

Terrifying: The bathroom of this stunning new penthouse in Guadalajara, México, is situated on top of an unused 15-story elevator shaft. (Via

Ah! I would.  That’s insane.  I couldn’t do it.  Just looking at the picture makes sort of shake.

More photos and info here.

May 2, 2012 at 9:50 AM 1 comment

Follow Me On Twitter