A Persuasive Argument That Obama is More Likely to Attack Iran Than Romney

July 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM 2 comments

This from Jeffrey Goldberg over at Salon, complimenting Obama on likely being more willing to attack Iran than Romney:

In Israel-Iran Conflict, Don’t Rely on Romney


Romney, by all accounts, is uninterested in inheriting the mantle of President George W. Bush, who invaded two Muslim countries and lost popularity and credibility as a result.  Romney, despite his rhetoric, is more of a pragmatist than Bush, and far more cautious. An attack on Iran is an incautious act, one that even Bush rejected.

The unilateral use of force in the Middle East for a liberal Democrat like Obama is a credential; for a conservative Republican like Romney, it could be an albatross. I argued in a previous column that Romney is more likely than Obama to oversee a revitalized Middle East peace process. That’s because conservatives are better positioned to make peace; liberals are generally better positioned to launch preventive strikes at the nuclear programs of rogue nations. We know that U.S. voters, and world leaders, allow Obama extraordinary leeway when it comes to deadly drone strikes, precisely because of his politics, character and background. (We are talking about a man, after all, who won the Nobel Peace Prize while ordering the automated killing of suspected Muslim terrorists around the world.) Romney will get no comparative slack.


Democrats have the (undeserved) wimp badge hanging around their neck whereas Republicans have the gun-slinging Texan hanging around theirs.  Obama may think he could earn his macho bona fides by going all the way against Iran whereas Romney probably feels he would look like another half-cocked Bush.

Makes scary sense to me.


Entry filed under: 2012 Election, George W. Bush and Co., President Barack H. Obama and Co., Republicans, Including Wingers & "Moderates", Wars.

Republicans: Romney is the “Worse Candidate Ever” Republicons Succeed at Convincing (More) Conservatives Obama is a Muslim

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. JC for pennies  |  July 28, 2012 at 5:43 AM

    I’ve long argued that if the Repugs tried anything really stupid now (like invading Iran, or even overturning Roe vs. Wade), outrage would paralyze the nation. Not so if a Democrat does the same thing. Only the far left of the party would get in his face, all the while being “shouted down” by the moderates. Want proof? They keep saying we should vote for Obama again. Say WHAT!? And thanks for the fresh highly-caffeinated coffee, SIAS.

  • 2. Say It Ain't So Already  |  July 28, 2012 at 8:17 AM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Follow Me On Twitter


%d bloggers like this: